← HomepageAll repository proofValidation recordState of TS Architecture 2026
Repository proof
What ArcSight found in NATS.js
Real arc impact on NATS.js (core) — blast radius, break paths, and evidence. Same question as the homepage: what breaks if I change this?
Project: NATS.js (core) · Score: 96.3/100 (Excellent architecture) · 31 modules · 114 edges
arc impact src/coreRun the same analysis on your repository in under 3 minutes.
Architectural Risk Map
Where risk accumulates by control surface — drill down Surface → Substrate → Mechanism → Evidence.
See control surfaces →Dependency evidence
Architecture visualization
Diagrams are generated from ArcSight analysis data. Dependency graph and risk map show key modules; subsystem view shows high-level structure.
Architecture score & metrics
Score: 96.3/100 · Stability: 61/100 · Status: healthy · Confidence: 100%
Architectural gravity centers
src/encoders— concentrates too many responsibilitiessrc/encoders— shared utility hubsrc/errors— concentrates too many responsibilitiessrc/errors— shared utility hubsrc/core— concentrates too many responsibilities
Try it in the terminal
Simulated arc analyze output from the dataset. No analysis runs in the browser.
Simulated from dataset. No analysis is run in the browser.
Similar architectures
Repositories with the same language and category, ordered by similar complexity and size.
CLI workflow
Impact, then scan, fix, finish, and watch.
arc impact <file>See what a change breaksarc scanFind issuesarc fixApply fixesarc finishResolve remainingarc watchKeep clean
- Score
- 96.3
- Modules
- 31
- Edges
- 114
Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Architecture score | 96.3/100 |
| Modules | 31 |
| Edges | 114 |
FAQ
- What did ArcSight find in NATS.js (core)?
- NATS.js (core) has 31 modules and an architecture score of 96.3/100.
- Why does the NATS.js (core) structure matter?
- The NATS.js (core) score is 96.3/100 across 31 modules and 114 edges.
- Which file should I inspect first in NATS.js (core)?
- Start with src/core. Run arc impact on that file before the change merges.
Key takeaways
- •Architecture score 96.3/100 indicates a healthy structure with room to reduce cycles and violations.
- •High fan-in modules are change-risk zones; run
arc explain <path>before refactoring. - •Run the full workflow (analyze, hotspots, explain, impact, snapshot, drift) in your repo for deterministic architecture insights.
Run ArcSight on your repo
Install locally, then run arc impact on the file you plan to change — before merge.
Embed this report
Use this iframe to show the architecture badge on your site.
<iframe src="https://arcsight.ai/embed/nats/" width="320" height="180" frameborder="0"></iframe>Explore
Evidence-backed analysis snapshot. Validation record · Install · Homepage demo