Skip to main content
ArcSight

← HomepageAll repository proofValidation recordState of TS Architecture 2026

Repository proof

What ArcSight found in Trigger.dev

Real arc impact on Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk) — blast radius, break paths, and evidence. Same question as the homepage: what breaks if I change this?

Project: Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk) · Score: 92.7/100 (Excellent architecture) · 49 modules · 93 edges

arc impact src/v3/tracer

Run the same analysis on your repository in under 3 minutes.

Proof summary

Four questions every public repository page must answer — see validation record.

Modules to inspect

One row per module. Fan-in is direct dependents. Blast radius is downstream modules reachable from that file.

Fan-in, direct dependents
  • src/v3/tracer17 dependents
  • src/v3/shared7 dependents
  • src/v3/ai-shared5 dependents
  • src/imports/ai-runtime3 dependents
  • src/v3/prompt3 dependents
  • src/v3/sessions3 dependents
  • src/v3/locals3 dependents
  • src/version1 dependents
Blast radius, downstream modules
  • src/v3/tracer24 modules
  • src/v3/shared7 modules
  • src/v3/ai-shared5 modules
  • src/imports/ai-runtime5 modules
  • src/v3/prompt5 modules
  • src/v3/sessions5 modules
  • src/v3/locals4 modules
ModuleFan-inBlastRisk
src/v3/tracer1724MEDIUM
src/v3/shared77LOW
src/v3/ai-shared55LOW
src/imports/ai-runtime35LOW
src/v3/prompt35HIGH
src/v3/sessions35HIGH
src/v3/locals34HIGH
src/version1LOW

What ArcSight found

src/v3/tracer: fan-in 17, blast radius 24, MEDIUM. 49 modules and 93 dependency edges traced.

Why it matters

In Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk), Change-risk signal at src/v3/tracer (fan-in 17) — merge impact can travel beyond the diff you see. Blast radius on src/v3/tracer reaches 24 downstream modules. ArcSight answers “what breaks if I change this?” before you ship; high fan-in is a change-risk signal, not a verdict on design quality.

What we'd inspect first

  • src/v3/tracer
  • src/v3/shared
  • src/v3/ai-shared

What evidence supports it

  • Local CLI analysis — repository source stays on your machine
  • Structural coverage: 49 modules, 93 edges in this snapshot
  • Reproducible fields match homepage live demo and frozen proof output

Architectural Risk Map

Where risk accumulates by control surface — drill down Surface → Substrate → Mechanism → Evidence.

See control surfaces →

Dependency evidence

Architecture visualization

Diagrams are generated from ArcSight analysis data. Dependency graph and risk map show key modules; subsystem view shows high-level structure.

Dependency graph
Dependency graph for this codebase
Subsystem architecture
Subsystem architecture for this codebase
Risk map
Risk map for this codebase

Architecture score & metrics

Score: 92.7/100 · Stability: 61/100 · Status: healthy · Confidence: 100%

  • Duplicate authorities: 19

Architectural gravity centers

  • src/v3/tracer— concentrates too many responsibilities
  • src/v3/tracer— shared utility hub

CLI workflow

Impact, then scan, fix, finish, and watch.

  • arc impact <file>See what a change breaks
  • arc scanFind issues
  • arc fixApply fixes
  • arc finishResolve remaining
  • arc watchKeep clean

More commands (explain, guard…) →

Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk) architecture metrics
Score
92.7
Modules
49
Edges
93

Metrics

MetricValue
Architecture score92.7/100
Modules49
Edges93

FAQ

What did ArcSight find in Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk)?
src/v3/tracer: fan-in 17, blast radius 24, MEDIUM. 49 modules and 93 dependency edges traced.
Why does the Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk) structure matter?
In Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk), Change-risk signal at src/v3/tracer (fan-in 17) — merge impact can travel beyond the diff you see. Blast radius on src/v3/tracer reaches 24 downstream modules. ArcSight answers “what breaks if I change this?” before you ship; high fan-in is a change-risk signal, not a verdict on design quality.
Which file should I inspect first in Trigger.dev (packages/trigger-sdk)?
Start with src/v3/tracer. Run arc impact on that file before the change merges.

Key takeaways

  • •Architecture score 92.7/100 indicates a healthy structure with room to reduce cycles and violations.
  • •High fan-in modules are change-risk zones; run arc explain <path> before refactoring.
  • •Run the full workflow (analyze, hotspots, explain, impact, snapshot, drift) in your repo for deterministic architecture insights.

Run ArcSight on your repo

Install locally, then run arc impact on the file you plan to change — before merge.

npm install -g arcsight
arc impact <path>
Install ArcSight →

Embed this report

Use this iframe to show the architecture badge on your site.

<iframe src="https://arcsight.ai/embed/trigger/" width="320" height="180" frameborder="0"></iframe>

Evidence-backed analysis snapshot. Validation record · Install · Homepage demo